ARGT vs IVV
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARGT | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $846M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.12% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 28 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +1.98% | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.43% | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +28.71% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +24.30% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 33.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -77.2% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 2, 2011 | May 15, 2000 |
ARGT vs IVV Performance
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ARGT returned +10.43% while IVV returned +22.61%. Year to date, ARGT is up 1.98% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.
Over three years, ARGT compounded at +28.71% per year against +21.47% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +24.30% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs +3.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARGT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -77.2% for ARGT and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARGT charges 0.59% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARGT currently yields 1.12% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ARGT and IVV share 0 holdings out of 530 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARGT or IVV?
ARGT has an expense ratio of 0.59% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ARGT or IVV?
Over the past year ARGT returned +10.43% vs +22.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), ARGT annualized +3.31% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ARGT or IVV?
ARGT has been the more volatile fund at 33.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ARGT -77.2% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ARGT and IVV?
ARGT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ARGT and IVV?
ARGT and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 530 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARGT or IVV?
ARGT yields 1.12% while IVV yields 1.09%, so ARGT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.