ARKG vs BBEM
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF vs JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
BBEM has a lower expense ratio. ARKG delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBEM offers more diversification with 889 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKG | BBEM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.15% | |
| AUM | $1.6B | $748M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.52% | |
| Holdings | 33 | 1,132 | |
| YTD Return | +47.50% | +15.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +84.80% | +32.69% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.13% | +19.42% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -13.10% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 36.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.6% | -17.4% | |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 31, 2014 | May 10, 2023 |
ARKG vs BBEM Performance
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF (ARKG) is a ETF from Ark Invest and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Over the past year ARKG returned +84.80% while BBEM returned +32.69%. Year to date, ARKG is up 47.50% versus a gain of 15.82% for BBEM.
Over three years, ARKG compounded at +9.13% per year against +19.42% for BBEM. Across the full 3-year window we track, BBEM has the edge at +19.55% annualized vs +7.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 36.3% compared with 15.1% for BBEM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.6% for ARKG and -17.4% for BBEM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARKG charges 0.75% per year while BBEM charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $15 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKG currently yields 0.00% against 2.52% for BBEM.
Holdings Overlap
ARKG and BBEM share 0 holdings out of 920 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARKG or BBEM?
ARKG has an expense ratio of 0.75% while BBEM charges 0.15%. BBEM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $60 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ARKG or BBEM?
Over the past year ARKG returned +84.80% vs +32.69% for BBEM, so ARKG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), ARKG annualized +7.65% vs +19.55% for BBEM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ARKG or BBEM?
ARKG has been the more volatile fund at 36.3% annualized versus 15.1% for BBEM. Worst drawdown: ARKG -83.6% vs BBEM -17.4%.
Should I hold both ARKG and BBEM?
ARKG and BBEM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ARKG and BBEM?
ARKG and BBEM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 920 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARKG or BBEM?
ARKG yields 0.00% while BBEM yields 2.52%, so BBEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.