ARKG vs FLGV
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF vs Franklin US Treasury Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
FLGV has a lower expense ratio. ARKG delivered stronger 1-year returns. FLGV offers more diversification with 51 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKG | FLGV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $1.6B | $1.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 4.23% | |
| Holdings | 32 | 51 | |
| YTD Return | +63.26% | -0.13% | |
| 1Y Return | +98.33% | +1.80% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.49% | +3.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -9.67% | -0.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 36.8% | 5.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.6% | -18.4% | |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Oct 31, 2014 | Jun 9, 2020 |
ARKG vs FLGV Performance
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF (ARKG) is a ETF from Ark Invest and Franklin US Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year ARKG returned +98.33% while FLGV returned +1.80%. Year to date, ARKG is up 63.26% versus a loss of 0.13% for FLGV.
Over three years, ARKG compounded at +15.49% per year against +3.75% for FLGV; over five years the annualized figures are -9.67% and -0.54% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, ARKG has the edge at +8.56% annualized vs -0.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 36.8% compared with 5.0% for FLGV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.6% for ARKG and -18.4% for FLGV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARKG charges 0.75% per year while FLGV charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $9 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKG currently yields 0.00% against 4.23% for FLGV.
Holdings Overlap
ARKG and FLGV share 0 holdings out of 32 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARKG or FLGV?
ARKG has an expense ratio of 0.75% while FLGV charges 0.09%. FLGV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $66 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ARKG or FLGV?
Over the past year ARKG returned +98.33% vs +1.80% for FLGV, so ARKG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ARKG annualized +8.56% vs -0.85% for FLGV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ARKG or FLGV?
ARKG has been the more volatile fund at 36.8% annualized versus 5.0% for FLGV. Worst drawdown: ARKG -83.6% vs FLGV -18.4%.
Should I hold both ARKG and FLGV?
ARKG and FLGV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ARKG and FLGV?
ARKG and FLGV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 32 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARKG or FLGV?
ARKG yields 0.00% while FLGV yields 4.23%, so FLGV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.