ARKG vs FMN
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF vs Federated Hermes Premier Municipal Income Fund
Quick Verdict
ARKG delivered stronger 1-year returns. FMN offers more diversification with 150 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKG | FMN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.75% | |
| AUM | $1.6B | $16M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 4.43% | |
| Holdings | 32 | 150 | |
| YTD Return | +69.47% | +1.66% | |
| 1Y Return | +103.58% | +8.44% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.92% | +7.15% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -9.64% | -3.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 37.0% | 14.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.6% | -53.4% | |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | Federated Hermes | |
| Category | Equity | Tax Preferred | |
| Inception | Oct 31, 2014 | Dec 20, 2002 |
ARKG vs FMN Performance
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF (ARKG) is a ETF from Ark Invest and Federated Hermes Premier Municipal Income Fund (FMN) is a ETF from Federated Hermes. Over the past year ARKG returned +103.58% while FMN returned +8.44%. Year to date, ARKG is up 69.47% versus a gain of 1.66% for FMN.
Over three years, ARKG compounded at +16.92% per year against +7.15% for FMN; over five years the annualized figures are -9.64% and -3.05% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, ARKG has the edge at +8.90% annualized vs -0.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.0% compared with 14.7% for FMN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.6% for ARKG and -53.4% for FMN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.37. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARKG charges 0.75% per year while FMN charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $75 annually. On income, ARKG currently yields 0.00% against 4.43% for FMN.
Holdings Overlap
ARKG and FMN share 0 holdings out of 116 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARKG or FMN?
ARKG has an expense ratio of 0.75% while FMN charges 0.75%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ARKG or FMN?
Over the past year ARKG returned +103.58% vs +8.44% for FMN, so ARKG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), ARKG annualized +8.90% vs -0.28% for FMN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ARKG or FMN?
ARKG has been the more volatile fund at 37.0% annualized versus 14.7% for FMN. Worst drawdown: ARKG -83.6% vs FMN -53.4%.
Should I hold both ARKG and FMN?
ARKG and FMN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.37, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ARKG and FMN?
ARKG and FMN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 116 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARKG or FMN?
ARKG yields 0.00% while FMN yields 4.43%, so FMN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.