ARKG vs SCHQ
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF vs Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHQ has a lower expense ratio. ARKG delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHQ offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKG | SCHQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.6B | $803M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 4.91% | |
| Holdings | 32 | 100 | |
| YTD Return | +63.26% | -2.39% | |
| 1Y Return | +98.33% | +0.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.49% | +1.26% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -9.67% | -7.14% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 36.8% | 13.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.6% | -46.7% | |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Oct 31, 2014 | Oct 10, 2019 |
ARKG vs SCHQ Performance
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF (ARKG) is a ETF from Ark Invest and Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF (SCHQ) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year ARKG returned +98.33% while SCHQ returned +0.01%. Year to date, ARKG is up 63.26% versus a loss of 2.39% for SCHQ.
Over three years, ARKG compounded at +15.49% per year against +1.26% for SCHQ; over five years the annualized figures are -9.67% and -7.14% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, ARKG has the edge at +8.56% annualized vs -4.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 36.8% compared with 13.5% for SCHQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.6% for ARKG and -46.7% for SCHQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARKG charges 0.75% per year while SCHQ charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKG currently yields 0.00% against 4.91% for SCHQ.
Holdings Overlap
ARKG and SCHQ share 0 holdings out of 123 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARKG or SCHQ?
ARKG has an expense ratio of 0.75% while SCHQ charges 0.03%. SCHQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ARKG or SCHQ?
Over the past year ARKG returned +98.33% vs +0.01% for SCHQ, so ARKG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), ARKG annualized +8.56% vs -4.36% for SCHQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ARKG or SCHQ?
ARKG has been the more volatile fund at 36.8% annualized versus 13.5% for SCHQ. Worst drawdown: ARKG -83.6% vs SCHQ -46.7%.
Should I hold both ARKG and SCHQ?
ARKG and SCHQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ARKG and SCHQ?
ARKG and SCHQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 123 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARKG or SCHQ?
ARKG yields 0.00% while SCHQ yields 4.91%, so SCHQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.