ARKG vs TYLG
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
TYLG has a lower expense ratio. ARKG delivered stronger 1-year returns. TYLG offers more diversification with 78 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKG | TYLG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.60% | |
| AUM | $1.6B | $15M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 8.89% | |
| Holdings | 32 | 78 | |
| YTD Return | +69.47% | +21.18% | |
| 1Y Return | +103.58% | +35.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.92% | +23.66% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -9.64% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 37.0% | 15.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.6% | -24.5% | |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | Global X by mirae Asset | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Oct 31, 2014 | Nov 21, 2022 |
ARKG vs TYLG Performance
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF (ARKG) is a ETF from Ark Invest and Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year ARKG returned +103.58% while TYLG returned +35.64%. Year to date, ARKG is up 69.47% versus a gain of 21.18% for TYLG.
Over three years, ARKG compounded at +16.92% per year against +23.66% for TYLG. Across the full 4-year window we track, TYLG has the edge at +25.12% annualized vs +8.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.0% compared with 15.8% for TYLG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.6% for ARKG and -24.5% for TYLG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARKG charges 0.75% per year while TYLG charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $60 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKG currently yields 0.00% against 8.89% for TYLG.
Holdings Overlap
ARKG and TYLG share 0 holdings out of 105 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARKG or TYLG?
ARKG has an expense ratio of 0.75% while TYLG charges 0.60%. TYLG is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ARKG or TYLG?
Over the past year ARKG returned +103.58% vs +35.64% for TYLG, so ARKG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), ARKG annualized +8.90% vs +25.12% for TYLG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ARKG or TYLG?
ARKG has been the more volatile fund at 37.0% annualized versus 15.8% for TYLG. Worst drawdown: ARKG -83.6% vs TYLG -24.5%.
Should I hold both ARKG and TYLG?
ARKG and TYLG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ARKG and TYLG?
ARKG and TYLG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 105 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARKG or TYLG?
ARKG yields 0.00% while TYLG yields 8.89%, so TYLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.