ARKW vs SCHD
ARK Next Generation Internet ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, ARKW or SCHD?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. ARKW led over 3Y and the full window, SCHD over 1Y and 5Y. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKW | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $1.6B | $112.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.72% | 3.13% |
| Holdings | 44 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +6.00% | +26.13%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.55% | +30.01%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +39.32%Best | +16.09% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.87% | +9.95%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 33.7% | 14.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -80.0% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,971 | $16,069Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.0% | 41.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2014 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 30, 2014 to Sep 8, 2026 (11.9 years).
ARKW vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.9 years both funds cover.
ARKW vs SCHD Performance
ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) is an ETF from Ark Invest and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year ARKW returned +1.55% while SCHD returned +30.01%. Year to date, ARKW is up 6.00% versus a gain of 26.13% for SCHD.
Over three years, ARKW compounded at +39.32% per year against +16.09% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +1.87% and +9.95% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, ARKW has the edge at +21.33% annualized vs +10.36%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.7% compared with 14.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -80.0% for ARKW and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARKW charges 0.76% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $6 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKW currently yields 1.72% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 41 holdings in ARKW and 100 in SCHD, totalling 97.5% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in ARKW and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 44 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 98 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for ARKW (99.7% of the fund), and 35 for ARKW that do not appear in SCHD (88.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ARKW and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARKW or SCHD?
ARKW has an expense ratio of 0.76% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $70 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ARKW or SCHD?
Over the past year ARKW returned +1.55% vs +30.01% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), ARKW annualized +21.33% vs +10.36% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ARKW or SCHD?
ARKW has been the more volatile fund at 33.7% annualized versus 14.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: ARKW -80.0% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both ARKW and SCHD?
ARKW and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARKW or SCHD?
ARKW yields 1.72% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than ARKW?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. ARKW led over 3Y and the full window, SCHD over 1Y and 5Y. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.