ARKW vs VTI

ARKW vs VTI

Which is better, ARKW or VTI?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. ARKW led over 3Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y and 5Y.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricARKWVTI
Expense Ratio0.76%0.03%Best
AUM$1.6B$666.9B
Dividend Yield1.49%1.03%
Holdings443,543
YTD Return+4.27%+12.57%Best
1Y Return-2.52%+17.22%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+38.95%Best+20.87%
5Y Return (annualized)+1.94%+11.86%Best
Volatility (annualized)33.7%15.3%Best
Max Drawdown-80.0%-35.0%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$11,008$17,514Best
Fund FamilyArk InvestVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionSep 30, 2014May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 30, 2014 to Sep 11, 2026 (11.9 years).

ARKW vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.9 years both funds cover.

ARKW vs VTI Performance

ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) is an ETF from Ark Invest and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ARKW returned -2.52% while VTI returned +17.22%. Year to date, ARKW is up 4.27% versus a gain of 12.57% for VTI.

Over three years, ARKW compounded at +38.95% per year against +20.87% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +1.94% and +11.86% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, ARKW has the edge at +21.14% annualized vs +12.33%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ARKW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -80.0% for ARKW and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ARKW charges 0.76% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $3 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKW currently yields 1.49% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

ARKW already in VTI77.0%

At least 77.0% of ARKW's money is in holdings VTI also owns.

Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

Most of ARKW is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

The two holdings books were reported 48 days apart, ARKW as of Aug 17, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

30 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in ARKW and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 44 and 3,543.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ARKWWeight in VTIDifference
TSLATesla Inc7.36%1.63%5.73%
NVDANvidia Corp.2.31%6.32%4.01%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc.7.00%1.30%5.70%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.01%3.17%0.84%
GOOGAlphabet Inc3.51%2.27%1.24%
HOODRobinhood Markets Inc - A4.51%0.11%4.40%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.05%2.46%0.41%
CRWVCoreweave4.44%0.05%4.39%
CRCLCircle Internet Group In3.93%0.01%3.92%
SQBlock, Inc3.53%0.06%3.47%

77.0% of ARKW is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ARKWVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ARKW or VTI?

ARKW has an expense ratio of 0.76% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $73 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, ARKW or VTI?

Over the past year ARKW returned -2.52% vs +17.22% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), ARKW annualized +21.14% vs +12.33% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, ARKW or VTI?

ARKW has been the more volatile fund at 33.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ARKW -80.0% vs VTI -35.0%.

Should I hold both ARKW and VTI?

ARKW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between ARKW and VTI?

At least 77.0% of ARKW's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in ARKW and 2,787 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, ARKW or VTI?

ARKW yields 1.49% while VTI yields 1.03%, so ARKW currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than ARKW?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. ARKW led over 3Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y and 5Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.