ARMU vs IVV
T-REX 2X Long ARM Daily Target ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARMU | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.05% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 3 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +5.45% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | -34.04% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 111.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -68.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 4, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
ARMU vs IVV Performance
T-REX 2X Long ARM Daily Target ETF (ARMU) is a ETF from REX Shares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ARMU returned -34.04% while IVV returned +22.02%. Year to date, ARMU is up 5.45% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARMU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 111.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.1% for ARMU and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.37. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARMU charges 1.05% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $105 vs $3 annually, a gap of $102 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARMU currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for IVV.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARMU or IVV?
ARMU has an expense ratio of 1.05% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $102 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ARMU or IVV?
Over the past year ARMU returned -34.04% vs +22.02% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ARMU annualized -35.49% vs +7.07% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ARMU or IVV?
ARMU has been the more volatile fund at 111.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ARMU -68.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ARMU and IVV?
ARMU and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.37, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARMU or IVV?
ARMU yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.