ARMW vs IVV
Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ARMW or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ARMW led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARMW | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $23M | $882.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 75.57% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 5 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +89.60%Best | +12.76% |
| 1Y Return | +19.01%Best | +15.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.95% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.54% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 111.2% | 13.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
ARMW vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ARMW vs IVV Performance
Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW) is an ETF from Roundhill Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ARMW returned +19.01% while IVV returned +15.57%. Year to date, ARMW is up 89.60% versus a gain of 12.76% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARMW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 111.2% compared with 13.3% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARMW charges 1.00% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARMW currently yields 75.57% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in ARMW and 505 in IVV, totalling 28.4% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in ARMW and 505 in IVV, against full books of 5 and 508.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ARMW and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARMW or IVV?
ARMW has an expense ratio of 1.00% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $97 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ARMW or IVV?
Over the past year ARMW returned +19.01% vs +15.57% for IVV, so ARMW leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ARMW or IVV?
ARMW has been the more volatile fund at 111.2% annualized versus 13.3% for IVV.
Should I hold both ARMW and IVV?
ARMW and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARMW or IVV?
ARMW yields 75.57% while IVV yields 1.06%, so ARMW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ARMW?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ARMW led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.