AUGW vs SCHD
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer20 Aug ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AUGW | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.74% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $134M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +6.60% | +24.26% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.27% | +31.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.85% | +15.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.72% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.6% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -8.8% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | AllianzIM | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 31, 2023 | Oct 20, 2011 |
AUGW vs SCHD Performance
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer20 Aug ETF (AUGW) is a ETF from AllianzIM and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year AUGW returned +11.27% while SCHD returned +31.38%. Year to date, AUGW is up 6.60% versus a gain of 24.26% for SCHD.
Over three years, AUGW compounded at +11.85% per year against +15.08% for SCHD. Across the full 3-year window we track, AUGW has the edge at +11.46% annualized vs +11.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 5.6% for AUGW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.8% for AUGW and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AUGW charges 0.74% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $6 annually, a gap of $68 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AUGW currently yields 0.00% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AUGW or SCHD?
AUGW has an expense ratio of 0.74% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $68 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AUGW or SCHD?
Over the past year AUGW returned +11.27% vs +31.38% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), AUGW annualized +11.46% vs +11.39% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AUGW or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 5.6% for AUGW. Worst drawdown: AUGW -8.8% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both AUGW and SCHD?
AUGW and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, AUGW or SCHD?
AUGW yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.