AUMI vs IVV
Themes Gold Miners ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. AUMI delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AUMI | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $24M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.03% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 36 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +18.53% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +79.08% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 44.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Themes ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
AUMI vs IVV Performance
Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) is a ETF from Themes ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AUMI returned +79.08% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, AUMI is up 18.53% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AUMI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 44.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.8% for AUMI and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.03. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AUMI charges 0.35% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AUMI currently yields 1.03% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
AUMI and IVV share 0 holdings out of 537 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AUMI or IVV?
AUMI has an expense ratio of 0.35% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AUMI or IVV?
Over the past year AUMI returned +79.08% vs +21.89% for IVV, so AUMI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), AUMI annualized +71.81% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AUMI or IVV?
AUMI has been the more volatile fund at 44.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: AUMI -39.8% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both AUMI and IVV?
AUMI and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.03, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AUMI and IVV?
AUMI and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 537 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AUMI or IVV?
AUMI yields 1.03% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.