AVES vs VTI
Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AVES | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.36% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.5B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.60% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 1,887 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +10.81% | +13.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.11% | +22.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.14% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.00% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -27.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Avantis Investors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 29, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
AVES vs VTI Performance
Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) is a ETF from Avantis Investors and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AVES returned +20.11% while VTI returned +22.17%. Year to date, AVES is up 10.81% versus a gain of 13.67% for VTI.
Over three years, AVES compounded at +19.14% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +9.00% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, AVES has the edge at +9.00% annualized vs +8.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AVES has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.4% for AVES and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AVES charges 0.36% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $36 vs $3 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVES currently yields 2.60% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
AVES and VTI share 1 holdings out of 3978 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AVES | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| RCL | 0.01% | 0.11% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AVES or VTI?
AVES has an expense ratio of 0.36% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $33 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AVES or VTI?
Over the past year AVES returned +20.11% vs +22.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), AVES annualized +9.00% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AVES or VTI?
AVES has been the more volatile fund at 16.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AVES -27.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both AVES and VTI?
AVES and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AVES and VTI?
AVES and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3978 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AVES or VTI?
AVES yields 2.60% while VTI yields 1.07%, so AVES currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.