AVGB vs IVV
Avantis Credit ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AVGB | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $20M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.25% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 160 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +0.87% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.09% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -2.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Avantis Investors | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 15, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
AVGB vs IVV Performance
Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB) is a ETF from Avantis Investors and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AVGB returned +3.09% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, AVGB is up 0.87% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 2.4% for AVGB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -2.1% for AVGB and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AVGB charges 0.19% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $3 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVGB currently yields 3.25% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
AVGB and IVV share 1 holdings out of 596 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AVGB | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GE | 0.54% | 0.55% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AVGB or IVV?
AVGB has an expense ratio of 0.19% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $16 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AVGB or IVV?
Over the past year AVGB returned +3.09% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), AVGB annualized +4.85% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AVGB or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 2.4% for AVGB. Worst drawdown: AVGB -2.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both AVGB and IVV?
AVGB and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AVGB and IVV?
AVGB and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 596 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AVGB or IVV?
AVGB yields 3.25% while IVV yields 1.10%, so AVGB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.