AVGW vs VTI
Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AVGW | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $49M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 70.08% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -13.74% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.72% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 54.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -37.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 24, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
AVGW vs VTI Performance
Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay ETF (AVGW) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AVGW returned +4.72% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, AVGW is down 13.74% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AVGW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 54.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.6% for AVGW and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AVGW charges 1.00% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVGW currently yields 70.08% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
AVGW and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AVGW | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGO | 26.55% | 2.46% | 24.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AVGW or VTI?
AVGW has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AVGW or VTI?
Over the past year AVGW returned +4.72% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), AVGW annualized +4.39% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AVGW or VTI?
AVGW has been the more volatile fund at 54.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AVGW -37.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both AVGW and VTI?
AVGW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AVGW and VTI?
AVGW and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 2.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AVGW or VTI?
AVGW yields 70.08% while VTI yields 1.07%, so AVGW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.