AVL vs VTI
Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AVL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $186M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 28.25% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 10 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +5.12% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.81% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 112.5% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -70.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 10, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
AVL vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X ETF (AVL) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AVL returned +15.81% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, AVL is up 5.12% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AVL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 112.5% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -70.6% for AVL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.40. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AVL charges 1.00% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVL currently yields 28.25% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
AVL and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2791 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AVL | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGO | 15.97% | 2.46% | 13.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AVL or VTI?
AVL has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AVL or VTI?
Over the past year AVL returned +15.81% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AVL annualized +56.78% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AVL or VTI?
AVL has been the more volatile fund at 112.5% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AVL -70.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both AVL and VTI?
AVL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.40, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AVL and VTI?
AVL and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 2.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2791 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AVL or VTI?
AVL yields 28.25% while VTI yields 1.07%, so AVL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.