AZNH vs VTI
AstraZeneca PLC ADRhedged vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AZNH | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -1.50% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.04% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ADRH | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 1, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
AZNH vs VTI Performance
AstraZeneca PLC ADRhedged (AZNH) is a ETF from ADRH and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AZNH returned +18.04% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, AZNH is down 1.50% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AZNH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.4% for AZNH and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.06. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AZNH charges 0.19% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $3 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AZNH currently yields 1.07% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
AZNH and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AZNH or VTI?
AZNH has an expense ratio of 0.19% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $16 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AZNH or VTI?
Over the past year AZNH returned +18.04% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), AZNH annualized +11.55% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AZNH or VTI?
AZNH has been the more volatile fund at 21.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AZNH -17.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both AZNH and VTI?
AZNH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.06, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AZNH and VTI?
AZNH and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AZNH or VTI?
AZNH yields 1.07% while VTI yields 1.07%, so AZNH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.