AZNH vs VTI
AstraZeneca PLC ADRhedged vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, AZNH or VTI?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. AZNH led over 1Y, VTI over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AZNH | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 2 | 3,543 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.7% | 11.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -17.4%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $11,527 | $12,316Best |
| Fund Family | ADRH | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 1, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 227 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. AZNH has data through Jan 30, 2026 and VTI through Sep 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 7, 2024 to Jan 30, 2026 (1.3 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AZNH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.7% compared with 11.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.4% for AZNH and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.06. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AZNH charges 0.19% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $3 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AZNH currently yields 1.07% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in AZNH and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 96.3% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 273 days apart, AZNH as of Oct 31, 2025 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in AZNH and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 2 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AZNH and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AZNH or VTI?
AZNH has an expense ratio of 0.19% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, AZNH or VTI?
AZNH has been the more volatile fund at 21.7% annualized versus 11.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AZNH -17.4% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both AZNH and VTI?
AZNH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.06, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AZNH or VTI?
AZNH yields 1.07% while VTI yields 1.03%, so AZNH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than AZNH?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. AZNH led over 1Y, VTI over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.