AZTD vs IVV
Aztlan Global Stock Selection DM SMID ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, AZTD or IVV?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. AZTD is less concentrated, with 22.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AZTD | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $38M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.92% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 55 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +9.07% | +11.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.39% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.82% | +20.71%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.80% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 14.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.8%Best | -18.8% |
| $10,000 over 4.1 years | $16,096 | $18,856Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.9%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | Aztlan Equity Management, LLC | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 17, 2022 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 18, 2022 to Sep 10, 2026 (4.1 years).
AZTD vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.1 years both funds cover.
AZTD vs IVV Performance
Aztlan Global Stock Selection DM SMID ETF (AZTD) is an ETF from Aztlan Equity Management, LLC and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AZTD returned +10.39% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, AZTD is up 9.07% versus a gain of 11.57% for IVV.
Over three years, AZTD compounded at +15.82% per year against +20.71% for IVV. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +16.73% annualized vs +12.31%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AZTD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 14.2% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.8% for AZTD and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AZTD charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AZTD currently yields 0.92% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
6.0% of AZTD's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings AZTD also owns.
AZTD and IVV share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in AZTD and 505 in IVV, against full books of 55 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 492 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for AZTD (99.2% of the fund), and 25 for AZTD that do not appear in IVV (48.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AZTD and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AZTD or IVV?
AZTD has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AZTD or IVV?
Over the past year AZTD returned +10.39% vs +17.57% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), AZTD annualized +12.31% vs +16.73% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AZTD or IVV?
AZTD has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 14.2% for IVV. Worst drawdown: AZTD -16.8% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both AZTD and IVV?
AZTD and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AZTD and IVV?
6.0% of AZTD's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.1% of IVV's is in holdings AZTD also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in AZTD and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, AZTD or IVV?
AZTD yields 0.92% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than AZTD?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. AZTD is less concentrated, with 22.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.