BABX vs IVV
GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BABX | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $97M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -43.90% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | -19.45% | +21.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -0.55% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 95.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -78.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2022 | May 15, 2000 |
BABX vs IVV Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) is a ETF from GraniteShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BABX returned -19.45% while IVV returned +21.64%. Year to date, BABX is down 43.90% versus a gain of 13.72% for IVV.
Over three years, BABX compounded at -0.55% per year against +21.55% for IVV. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs -3.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BABX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 95.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.8% for BABX and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.20. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BABX charges 1.15% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $115 vs $3 annually, a gap of $112 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BABX currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BABX and IVV share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BABX or IVV?
BABX has an expense ratio of 1.15% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $112 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BABX or IVV?
Over the past year BABX returned -19.45% vs +21.64% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BABX annualized -3.56% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BABX or IVV?
BABX has been the more volatile fund at 95.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BABX -78.8% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BABX and IVV?
BABX and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.20, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BABX and IVV?
BABX and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BABX or IVV?
BABX yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.