BABX vs VTI
GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BABX | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $97M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -46.62% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | -28.64% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -2.18% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 95.4% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -78.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
BABX vs VTI Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BABX returned -28.64% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, BABX is down 46.62% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, BABX compounded at -2.18% per year against +21.51% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs -4.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BABX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 95.4% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.8% for BABX and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.18. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BABX charges 1.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $115 vs $3 annually, a gap of $112 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BABX currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BABX and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BABX or VTI?
BABX has an expense ratio of 1.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $112 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BABX or VTI?
Over the past year BABX returned -28.64% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BABX annualized -4.85% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BABX or VTI?
BABX has been the more volatile fund at 95.4% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BABX -78.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BABX and VTI?
BABX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.18, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BABX and VTI?
BABX and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BABX or VTI?
BABX yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.