BAIV vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: TiedMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBAIVIVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.60%0.03%
AUM$144M$907.0B
Dividend Yield-1.10%
Holdings56508
YTD Return+12.33%+14.29%
1Y Return-+21.79%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.19%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.28%
Volatility (annualized)-15.1%
Max Drawdown-11.4%-56.5%
Fund FamilyBrown AdvisoryiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionFeb 25, 2026May 15, 2000

BAIV vs IVV Performance

Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF (BAIV) is a ETF from Brown Advisory and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, BAIV is up 12.33% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.4% for BAIV and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BAIV charges 0.60% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period.

Holdings Overlap

0.0%overlap

BAIV and IVV share 0 holdings out of 555 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BAIV or IVV?

BAIV has an expense ratio of 0.60% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.

What is the holdings overlap between BAIV and IVV?

BAIV and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 555 unique securities.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.