BAMB vs QQQ
Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAMB | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.03% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $58M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.97% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -1.75% | +16.23% | |
| 1Y Return | -0.13% | +26.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.49% | +25.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.8% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.5% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Brookstone Asset Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BAMB vs QQQ Performance
Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF (BAMB) is a ETF from Brookstone Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BAMB returned -0.13% while QQQ returned +26.23%. Year to date, BAMB is down 1.75% versus a gain of 16.23% for QQQ.
Over three years, BAMB compounded at +3.49% per year against +25.75% for QQQ. Across the full 3-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.02% annualized vs +3.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 3.8% for BAMB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.5% for BAMB and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.10. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAMB charges 1.03% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $103 vs $18 annually, a gap of $85 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAMB currently yields 2.97% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BAMB and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 106 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAMB or QQQ?
BAMB has an expense ratio of 1.03% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $85 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BAMB or QQQ?
Over the past year BAMB returned -0.13% vs +26.23% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BAMB annualized +3.49% vs +13.02% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BAMB or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 3.8% for BAMB. Worst drawdown: BAMB -4.5% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BAMB and QQQ?
BAMB and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.10, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BAMB and QQQ?
BAMB and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 106 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAMB or QQQ?
BAMB yields 2.97% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BAMB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.