BAMO vs VTI
Brookstone Opportunities ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAMO | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.06% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $47M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.45% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +7.31% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.66% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.62% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -12.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Brookstone Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 28, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
BAMO vs VTI Performance
Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO) is a ETF from Brookstone Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BAMO returned +12.66% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, BAMO is up 7.31% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, BAMO compounded at +13.62% per year against +21.83% for VTI. Across the full 3-year window we track, BAMO has the edge at +13.62% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 7.5% for BAMO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.7% for BAMO and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAMO charges 1.06% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $106 vs $3 annually, a gap of $103 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAMO currently yields 1.45% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BAMO and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2792 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAMO or VTI?
BAMO has an expense ratio of 1.06% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $103 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BAMO or VTI?
Over the past year BAMO returned +12.66% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BAMO annualized +13.62% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BAMO or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 7.5% for BAMO. Worst drawdown: BAMO -12.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BAMO and VTI?
BAMO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between BAMO and VTI?
BAMO and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2792 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAMO or VTI?
BAMO yields 1.45% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BAMO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.