BAMO vs VOO
Brookstone Opportunities ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BAMO or VOO?
Nearly the same fund. VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAMO | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.06% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $46M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.36% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 7 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +6.21% | +12.37%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.35% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.86% | +21.37%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.49% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.5%Best | 12.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.7%Best | -18.7% |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $14,375 | $18,572Best |
| Top 10 Weight | - | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | Brookstone Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 28, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 28, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (3 years).
BAMO vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
BAMO vs VOO Performance
Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO) is an ETF from Brookstone Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BAMO returned +9.35% while VOO returned +16.61%. Year to date, BAMO is up 6.21% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.
Over three years, BAMO compounded at +12.86% per year against +21.37% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.4% compared with 7.5% for BAMO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.7% for BAMO and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAMO charges 1.06% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $106 vs $3 annually, a gap of $103 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAMO currently yields 1.36% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 5 holdings in BAMO and 494 in VOO, totalling 99.6% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 5 positions we hold weights for in BAMO and 494 in VOO, against full books of 7 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 487 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for BAMO (99.2% of the fund), and 5 for BAMO that do not appear in VOO (99.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BAMO and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAMO or VOO?
BAMO has an expense ratio of 1.06% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $103 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BAMO or VOO?
Over the past year BAMO returned +9.35% vs +16.61% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BAMO or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 12.4% annualized versus 7.5% for BAMO. Worst drawdown: BAMO -12.7% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both BAMO and VOO?
BAMO and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAMO or VOO?
BAMO yields 1.36% while VOO yields 1.04%, so BAMO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than BAMO?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.