BBEM vs ELCV
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Eventide High Dividend ETF
Quick Verdict
BBEM has a lower expense ratio. BBEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBEM offers more diversification with 889 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBEM | ELCV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.49% | |
| AUM | $748M | $251M | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.52% | 2.06% | |
| Holdings | 1,132 | 47 | |
| YTD Return | +15.82% | +18.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.69% | +25.13% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.42% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 13.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.4% | -18.4% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Eventide | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 10, 2023 | Sep 30, 2024 |
BBEM vs ELCV Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV) is a ETF from Eventide. Over the past year BBEM returned +32.69% while ELCV returned +25.13%. Year to date, BBEM is up 15.82% versus a gain of 18.65% for ELCV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBEM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.8% for ELCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.4% for BBEM and -18.4% for ELCV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBEM charges 0.15% per year while ELCV charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $49 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBEM currently yields 2.52% against 2.06% for ELCV.
Holdings Overlap
BBEM and ELCV share 0 holdings out of 935 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBEM or ELCV?
BBEM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while ELCV charges 0.49%. BBEM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $34 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBEM or ELCV?
Over the past year BBEM returned +32.69% vs +25.13% for ELCV, so BBEM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BBEM annualized +19.55% vs +15.23% for ELCV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBEM or ELCV?
BBEM has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.8% for ELCV. Worst drawdown: BBEM -17.4% vs ELCV -18.4%.
Should I hold both BBEM and ELCV?
BBEM and ELCV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBEM and ELCV?
BBEM and ELCV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 935 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBEM or ELCV?
BBEM yields 2.52% while ELCV yields 2.06%, so BBEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.