BBEM vs VTI
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BBEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBEM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $748M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.52% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 1,132 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +15.27% | +14.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.50% | +23.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.67% | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.33% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 10, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
BBEM vs VTI Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBEM returned +32.50% while VTI returned +23.62%. Year to date, BBEM is up 15.27% versus a gain of 14.16% for VTI.
Over three years, BBEM compounded at +19.67% per year against +21.43% for VTI. Across the full 3-year window we track, BBEM has the edge at +19.32% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 15.1% for BBEM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.4% for BBEM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBEM charges 0.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBEM currently yields 2.52% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BBEM and VTI share 8 holdings out of 3664 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBEM or VTI?
BBEM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBEM or VTI?
Over the past year BBEM returned +32.50% vs +23.62% for VTI, so BBEM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BBEM annualized +19.32% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBEM or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 15.1% for BBEM. Worst drawdown: BBEM -17.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BBEM and VTI?
BBEM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBEM and VTI?
BBEM and VTI share 8 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3664 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBEM or VTI?
BBEM yields 2.52% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BBEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.