BBEM vs FLGV
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Franklin US Treasury Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
FLGV has a lower expense ratio. BBEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBEM offers more diversification with 889 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBEM | FLGV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $748M | $1.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.52% | 4.11% | |
| Holdings | 1,132 | 47 | |
| YTD Return | +15.27% | -0.85% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.50% | +1.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.67% | +3.24% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | -0.57% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 5.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.4% | -18.4% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 10, 2023 | Jun 9, 2020 |
BBEM vs FLGV Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Franklin US Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year BBEM returned +32.50% while FLGV returned +1.12%. Year to date, BBEM is up 15.27% versus a loss of 0.85% for FLGV.
Over three years, BBEM compounded at +19.67% per year against +3.24% for FLGV. Across the full 3-year window we track, BBEM has the edge at +19.32% annualized vs -0.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBEM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 5.0% for FLGV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.4% for BBEM and -18.4% for FLGV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBEM charges 0.15% per year while FLGV charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $9 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBEM currently yields 2.52% against 4.11% for FLGV.
Holdings Overlap
BBEM and FLGV share 0 holdings out of 930 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBEM or FLGV?
BBEM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while FLGV charges 0.09%. FLGV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBEM or FLGV?
Over the past year BBEM returned +32.50% vs +1.12% for FLGV, so BBEM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BBEM annualized +19.32% vs -0.97% for FLGV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBEM or FLGV?
BBEM has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 5.0% for FLGV. Worst drawdown: BBEM -17.4% vs FLGV -18.4%.
Should I hold both BBEM and FLGV?
BBEM and FLGV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBEM and FLGV?
BBEM and FLGV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 930 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBEM or FLGV?
BBEM yields 2.52% while FLGV yields 4.11%, so FLGV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.