BBEM vs FMN
BBEM vs FMN
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Federated Hermes Premier Municipal Income Fund
Quick Verdict
BBEM has a lower expense ratio. BBEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBEM offers more diversification with 889 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBEM | FMN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.75% | |
| AUM | $748M | $16M | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.52% | 4.29% | |
| Holdings | 1,132 | 150 | |
| YTD Return | +15.82% | +3.51% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.69% | +9.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.42% | +7.05% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | -2.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.4% | -53.4% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Federated Hermes | |
| Category | Equity | Tax Preferred | |
| Inception | May 10, 2023 | Dec 20, 2002 |
BBEM vs FMN Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Federated Hermes Premier Municipal Income Fund (FMN) is a ETF from Federated Hermes. Over the past year BBEM returned +32.69% while FMN returned +9.90%. Year to date, BBEM is up 15.82% versus a gain of 3.51% for FMN.
Over three years, BBEM compounded at +19.42% per year against +7.05% for FMN. Across the full 3-year window we track, BBEM has the edge at +19.55% annualized vs -0.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBEM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.7% for FMN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.4% for BBEM and -53.4% for FMN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBEM charges 0.15% per year while FMN charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $75 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBEM currently yields 2.52% against 4.29% for FMN.
Holdings Overlap
BBEM and FMN share 0 holdings out of 974 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBEM or FMN?
BBEM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while FMN charges 0.75%. BBEM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $60 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBEM or FMN?
Over the past year BBEM returned +32.69% vs +9.90% for FMN, so BBEM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BBEM annualized +19.55% vs -0.21% for FMN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBEM or FMN?
BBEM has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.7% for FMN. Worst drawdown: BBEM -17.4% vs FMN -53.4%.
Should I hold both BBEM and FMN?
BBEM and FMN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBEM and FMN?
BBEM and FMN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 974 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBEM or FMN?
BBEM yields 2.52% while FMN yields 4.29%, so FMN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.