BBEM vs GTOS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
BBEM has a lower expense ratio. BBEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBEM offers more diversification with 889 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBEM | GTOS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.30% | |
| AUM | $748M | $122M | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.52% | 4.55% | |
| Holdings | 1,132 | 1,047 | |
| YTD Return | +15.60% | -0.89% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.87% | +1.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.02% | +4.61% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 1.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.4% | -1.8% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 10, 2023 | Dec 9, 2022 |
BBEM vs GTOS Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF (GTOS) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BBEM returned +32.87% while GTOS returned +1.12%. Year to date, BBEM is up 15.60% versus a loss of 0.89% for GTOS.
Over three years, BBEM compounded at +20.02% per year against +4.61% for GTOS. Across the full 3-year window we track, BBEM has the edge at +19.41% annualized vs +4.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBEM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 1.9% for GTOS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.4% for BBEM and -1.8% for GTOS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.39. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBEM charges 0.15% per year while GTOS charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $30 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBEM currently yields 2.52% against 4.55% for GTOS.
Holdings Overlap
BBEM and GTOS share 0 holdings out of 1183 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBEM or GTOS?
BBEM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while GTOS charges 0.30%. BBEM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBEM or GTOS?
Over the past year BBEM returned +32.87% vs +1.12% for GTOS, so BBEM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BBEM annualized +19.41% vs +4.29% for GTOS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBEM or GTOS?
BBEM has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 1.9% for GTOS. Worst drawdown: BBEM -17.4% vs GTOS -1.8%.
Should I hold both BBEM and GTOS?
BBEM and GTOS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.39, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBEM and GTOS?
BBEM and GTOS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1183 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBEM or GTOS?
BBEM yields 2.52% while GTOS yields 4.55%, so GTOS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.