BBEM vs SAWS
BBEM vs SAWS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
BBEM has a lower expense ratio. BBEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBEM offers more diversification with 889 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBEM | SAWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.55% | |
| AUM | $748M | $8M | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.52% | 0.02% | |
| Holdings | 1,132 | 72 | |
| YTD Return | +15.82% | +16.18% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.69% | +25.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.42% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 18.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.4% | -22.0% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 10, 2023 | Jul 30, 2024 |
BBEM vs SAWS Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) is a ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc.. Over the past year BBEM returned +32.69% while SAWS returned +25.78%. Year to date, BBEM is up 15.82% versus a gain of 16.18% for SAWS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SAWS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.3% compared with 15.1% for BBEM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.4% for BBEM and -22.0% for SAWS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBEM charges 0.15% per year while SAWS charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $55 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBEM currently yields 2.52% against 0.02% for SAWS.
Holdings Overlap
BBEM and SAWS share 0 holdings out of 960 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBEM or SAWS?
BBEM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while SAWS charges 0.55%. BBEM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $40 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBEM or SAWS?
Over the past year BBEM returned +32.69% vs +25.78% for SAWS, so BBEM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BBEM annualized +19.55% vs +13.57% for SAWS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBEM or SAWS?
SAWS has been the more volatile fund at 18.3% annualized versus 15.1% for BBEM. Worst drawdown: BBEM -17.4% vs SAWS -22.0%.
Should I hold both BBEM and SAWS?
BBEM and SAWS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBEM and SAWS?
BBEM and SAWS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 960 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBEM or SAWS?
BBEM yields 2.52% while SAWS yields 0.02%, so BBEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.