BBEM vs TLTP
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Amplify TLT US Treasury 12% Option Income ETF
Quick Verdict
BBEM has a lower expense ratio. BBEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBEM offers more diversification with 889 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBEM | TLTP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.39% | |
| AUM | $748M | $23M | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.52% | 14.33% | |
| Holdings | 1,132 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +15.60% | -9.12% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.87% | -7.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.02% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 8.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.4% | -12.7% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Amplify ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 10, 2023 | Oct 29, 2024 |
BBEM vs TLTP Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Amplify TLT US Treasury 12% Option Income ETF (TLTP) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs. Over the past year BBEM returned +32.87% while TLTP returned -7.78%. Year to date, BBEM is up 15.60% versus a loss of 9.12% for TLTP.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBEM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 8.6% for TLTP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.4% for BBEM and -12.7% for TLTP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBEM charges 0.15% per year while TLTP charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $39 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBEM currently yields 2.52% against 14.33% for TLTP.
Holdings Overlap
BBEM and TLTP share 0 holdings out of 892 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBEM or TLTP?
BBEM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while TLTP charges 0.39%. BBEM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $24 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBEM or TLTP?
Over the past year BBEM returned +32.87% vs -7.78% for TLTP, so BBEM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BBEM annualized +19.41% vs -5.23% for TLTP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBEM or TLTP?
BBEM has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 8.6% for TLTP. Worst drawdown: BBEM -17.4% vs TLTP -12.7%.
Should I hold both BBEM and TLTP?
BBEM and TLTP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBEM and TLTP?
BBEM and TLTP share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 892 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBEM or TLTP?
BBEM yields 2.52% while TLTP yields 14.33%, so TLTP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.