BBN vs IVV
BlackRock Taxable Municipal Bond Trust vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BBN or IVV?
Municipal Bond against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBN | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.0B | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 7.20% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 275 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -2.01% | +12.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | -1.61% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.24% | +21.27%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -4.03% | +12.95%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8%Best | 14.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -38.4% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $8,141 | $18,384Best |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity |
| Style | Municipal Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 27, 2010 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 27, 2010 to Sep 11, 2026 (16 years).
BBN vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BBN vs IVV Performance
BlackRock Taxable Municipal Bond Trust (BBN) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BBN returned -1.61% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, BBN is down 2.01% versus a gain of 12.51% for IVV.
Over three years, BBN compounded at +6.24% per year against +21.27% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -4.03% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.60% annualized vs +0.68%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 12.8% for BBN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.4% for BBN and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBN charges 1.07% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $3 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBN currently yields 7.20% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 87 holdings in BBN and 505 in IVV, totalling 75.7% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 127 days apart, BBN as of Mar 31, 2026 and IVV as of Aug 5, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 87 positions we hold weights for in BBN and 505 in IVV, against full books of 275 and 508.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BBN and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBN or IVV?
BBN has an expense ratio of 1.07% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $104 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BBN or IVV?
Over the past year BBN returned -1.61% vs +17.57% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), BBN annualized +0.68% vs +13.60% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BBN or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 12.8% for BBN. Worst drawdown: BBN -38.4% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both BBN and IVV?
BBN and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBN or IVV?
BBN yields 7.20% while IVV yields 1.06%, so BBN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BBN?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.