BCPL vs MAGG
BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF vs Madison Aggregate Bond ETF
Which is better, BCPL or MAGG?
MAGG costs less.
MAGG has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCPL | MAGG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.36%Best |
| AUM | $327M | $63M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.85% | 5.05% |
| Holdings | 366 | 406 |
| YTD Return | -2.66% | -2.52%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | -1.91% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +4.51% |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | Madison Funds |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Style | Investment Grade Bond | Investment Grade Bond |
| Inception | Jan 12, 2026 | Aug 28, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BCPL vs MAGG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BCPL vs MAGG Performance
BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF (BCPL) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Madison Aggregate Bond ETF (MAGG) is an ETF from Madison Funds. Year to date, BCPL is down 2.66% versus a loss of 2.52% for MAGG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCPL charges 0.40% per year while MAGG charges 0.36%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $36 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCPL currently yields 2.85% against 5.05% for MAGG.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 110 holdings in BCPL and 126 in MAGG, totalling 38.1% and 67.4% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 3 positions appear in both.
3 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in BCPL and 126 in MAGG, against full books of 366 and 406.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BCPL | Weight in MAGG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| T 4.375 08/31/28United States Treasuryu.S. Treasury Notes 08/31/2028 | 1.72% | 1.57% | 0.15% |
| FN MA4841Fn Ma4841 5 12/01/2052 | 0.07% | 1.20% | 1.13% |
| EPD 5.35 01/31/33Enterprise Produ 5.35 01/31/2033 | 0.23% | 0.54% | 0.31% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BCPL and MAGG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCPL or MAGG?
BCPL has an expense ratio of 0.40% while MAGG charges 0.36%. MAGG is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCPL or MAGG?
BCPL yields 2.85% while MAGG yields 5.05%, so MAGG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MAGG better than BCPL?
MAGG has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.