BCSM vs VTI
Baron SMID Cap ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, BCSM or VTI?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCSM | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | - | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 58 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +0.04% | +11.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +15.05% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.32% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.50% |
| Fund Family | Baron Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 12, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BCSM vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BCSM vs VTI Performance
Baron SMID Cap ETF (BCSM) is an ETF from Baron Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, BCSM is up 0.04% versus a gain of 11.95% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCSM charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCSM currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 1.9% of VTI's money is in holdings BCSM also owns.
Stated as a floor: for BCSM, our book for it covers 93.9% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VTI and BCSM share little of their money.
50 positions in common, counted across the 56 positions we hold weights for in BCSM and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 58 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BCSM | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AXONAxon Enterprise Inc | 4.13% | 0.06% | 4.07% |
| IOTSamsara Inc | 3.19% | 0.02% | 3.17% |
| RBRKRubrik Inc-A | 3.14% | 0.02% | 3.12% |
| GWREGuidewire Software Inc | 2.88% | 0.02% | 2.86% |
| LOARLoar Holdings Inc | 2.89% | 0.00% | 2.89% |
| DTDynatrace Inc | 2.71% | 0.02% | 2.69% |
| FWONALiberty Formula One Group A | 2.53% | 0.00% | 2.53% |
| LLYVKLiberty Live Holdings C | 2.29% | 0.01% | 2.28% |
| MRCYMercury Systems Inc | 2.23% | 0.01% | 2.22% |
| LPLALpl Holdings | 2.13% | 0.04% | 2.09% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BCSM and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCSM or VTI?
BCSM has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BCSM and VTI?
At least 1.9% of VTI's money is in holdings BCSM also owns. Our book for BCSM is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 50 positions in common, counted across the 56 positions we hold weights for in BCSM and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCSM or VTI?
BCSM yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than BCSM?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.