BETE vs SPY
ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Which is better, BETE or SPY?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BETE | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.09%Best |
| AUM | $9M | $804.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 50.09% | 0.98% |
| Holdings | 2 | 505 |
| YTD Return | -18.39% | +12.47%Best |
| 1Y Return | -40.03% | +17.51%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.87% | +21.18%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.88% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 60.5% | 12.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -61.8% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $17,327 | $18,335Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | State Street Investment Management |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 2, 2023 | Jan 22, 1993 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 2, 2023 to Sep 11, 2026 (2.9 years).
BETE vs SPY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
BETE vs SPY Performance
ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight ETF (BETE) is an ETF from ProShares and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year BETE returned -40.03% while SPY returned +17.51%. Year to date, BETE is down 18.39% versus a gain of 12.47% for SPY.
Over three years, BETE compounded at +20.87% per year against +21.18% for SPY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BETE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 60.5% compared with 12.4% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -61.8% for BETE and -18.8% for SPY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BETE charges 0.95% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $9 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BETE currently yields 50.09% against 0.98% for SPY.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BETE and SPY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BETE or SPY?
BETE has an expense ratio of 0.95% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $86 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BETE or SPY?
Over the past year BETE returned -40.03% vs +17.51% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BETE or SPY?
BETE has been the more volatile fund at 60.5% annualized versus 12.4% for SPY. Worst drawdown: BETE -61.8% vs SPY -18.8%.
Should I hold both BETE and SPY?
BETE and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BETE or SPY?
BETE yields 50.09% while SPY yields 0.98%, so BETE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SPY better than BETE?
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.