BHV vs QQQ
BlackRock Virginia Municipal Bond Trust vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, BHV or QQQ?
Municipal Virginia against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. BHV led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BHV | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.60% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $18M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.11% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 43 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +22.78%Best | +15.86% |
| 1Y Return | +24.97%Best | +22.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.12% | +24.15%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.49% | +14.16%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6%Best | 19.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -57.4% | -53.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $8,815 | $19,390Best |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity |
| Style | Municipal Virginia | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Apr 30, 2002 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 26, 2002 to Sep 10, 2026 (24.4 years).
BHV vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BHV vs QQQ Performance
BlackRock Virginia Municipal Bond Trust (BHV) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BHV returned +24.97% while QQQ returned +22.63%. Year to date, BHV is up 22.78% versus a gain of 15.86% for QQQ.
Over three years, BHV compounded at +13.12% per year against +24.15% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -2.49% and +14.16% respectively. Across the full 24-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.84% annualized vs +0.20%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 16.6% for BHV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.4% for BHV and -53.5% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.27. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BHV charges 2.60% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $260 vs $18 annually, a gap of $242 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BHV currently yields 5.11% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 18 holdings in BHV and 102 in QQQ, totalling 63.7% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 186 days apart, BHV as of Jan 31, 2026 and QQQ as of Aug 5, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 18 positions we hold weights for in BHV and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 43 and 107.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BHV and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BHV or QQQ?
BHV has an expense ratio of 2.60% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $242 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BHV or QQQ?
Over the past year BHV returned +24.97% vs +22.63% for QQQ, so BHV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (24 years), BHV annualized +0.20% vs +13.84% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BHV or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 16.6% for BHV. Worst drawdown: BHV -57.4% vs QQQ -53.5%.
Should I hold both BHV and QQQ?
BHV and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.27, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BHV or QQQ?
BHV yields 5.11% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BHV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than BHV?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. BHV led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.