BIBL vs QQQ
Inspire 100 ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. BIBL delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BIBL | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $509M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.95% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 101 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +22.28% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +33.64% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.54% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.99% | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.2% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.1% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Inspire ETFs | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 30, 2017 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BIBL vs QQQ Performance
Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) is a ETF from Inspire ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BIBL returned +33.64% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, BIBL is up 22.28% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, BIBL compounded at +21.54% per year against +25.96% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +8.99% and +14.54% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +12.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 18.2% for BIBL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.1% for BIBL and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BIBL charges 0.35% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $18 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BIBL currently yields 0.95% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BIBL and QQQ share 12 holdings out of 189 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BIBL or QQQ?
BIBL has an expense ratio of 0.35% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BIBL or QQQ?
Over the past year BIBL returned +33.64% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so BIBL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), BIBL annualized +12.24% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BIBL or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 18.2% for BIBL. Worst drawdown: BIBL -36.1% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BIBL and QQQ?
BIBL and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BIBL and QQQ?
BIBL and QQQ share 12 common holdings with a 4.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 189 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BIBL or QQQ?
BIBL yields 0.95% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BIBL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.