BITK vs IVV
Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BITK | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 52.42% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -35.52% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -59.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Tuttle Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 24, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
BITK vs IVV Performance
Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF (BITK) is a ETF from Tuttle Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, BITK is down 35.52% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.3% for BITK and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BITK charges 0.99% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $3 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BITK currently yields 52.42% against 1.09% for IVV.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BITK or IVV?
BITK has an expense ratio of 0.99% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $96 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, BITK or IVV?
BITK yields 52.42% while IVV yields 1.09%, so BITK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.