BITK vs QQQ
Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BITK | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $2M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 52.42% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -35.52% | +17.85% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +26.45% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.07% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.16% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -59.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Tuttle Funds | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 24, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BITK vs QQQ Performance
Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF (BITK) is a ETF from Tuttle Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, BITK is down 35.52% versus a gain of 17.85% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.3% for BITK and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BITK charges 0.99% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $18 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BITK currently yields 52.42% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BITK or QQQ?
BITK has an expense ratio of 0.99% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $81 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, BITK or QQQ?
BITK yields 52.42% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so BITK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.