BITX vs VOO
2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BITX or VOO?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. BITX led over 3Y, VOO over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BITX | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.2B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 14.74% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 3 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -35.70% | +12.37%Best |
| 1Y Return | -66.28% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +31.52%Best | +21.37% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.49% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 107.5% | 12.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -83.5% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.2 years | $16,008 | $18,118Best |
| Fund Family | Volatility Shares, LLC | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 27, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 27, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (3.2 years).
BITX vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.2 years both funds cover.
BITX vs VOO Performance
2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITX) is an ETF from Volatility Shares, LLC and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BITX returned -66.28% while VOO returned +16.61%. Year to date, BITX is down 35.70% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.
Over three years, BITX compounded at +31.52% per year against +21.37% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BITX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 107.5% compared with 12.7% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.5% for BITX and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.38. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BITX charges 2.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $275 vs $3 annually, a gap of $272 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BITX currently yields 14.74% against 1.04% for VOO.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BITX and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BITX or VOO?
BITX has an expense ratio of 2.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $272 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BITX or VOO?
Over the past year BITX returned -66.28% vs +16.61% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BITX or VOO?
BITX has been the more volatile fund at 107.5% annualized versus 12.7% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BITX -83.5% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both BITX and VOO?
BITX and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.38, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BITX or VOO?
BITX yields 14.74% while VOO yields 1.04%, so BITX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than BITX?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. BITX led over 3Y, VOO over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.