BIV vs VCSH

Quick Verdict

VCSH delivered stronger 1-year returns. VCSH offers more diversification with 2440 holdings.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: VCSHMore Diversified: VCSH

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBIVVCSHWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.03%
AUM$29.3B$44.9B
Dividend Yield4.18%4.44%
Holdings2,3212,719
YTD Return-0.60%+0.86%
1Y Return+1.50%+2.85%
3Y Return (annualized)+4.67%+5.57%
5Y Return (annualized)-0.21%+2.33%
Volatility (annualized)5.7%2.6%
Max Drawdown-20.3%-12.9%
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeFixed Income
InceptionApr 3, 2007Nov 19, 2009

BIV vs VCSH Performance

Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond ETF (BIV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BIV returned +1.50% while VCSH returned +2.85%. Year to date, BIV is down 0.60% versus a gain of 0.86% for VCSH.

Over three years, BIV compounded at +4.67% per year against +5.57% for VCSH; over five years the annualized figures are -0.21% and +2.33% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, VCSH has the edge at +1.29% annualized vs +1.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BIV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 5.7% compared with 2.6% for VCSH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.3% for BIV and -12.9% for VCSH. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BIV charges 0.03% per year while VCSH charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $3 annually. On income, BIV currently yields 4.18% against 4.44% for VCSH.

Holdings Overlap

0.4%overlap

BIV and VCSH share 38 holdings out of 4503 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BIVWeight in VCSHDifference
BMY 5.1 02/22/310.02%0.06%0.04%
BRITEL 9.625 12/15/30.05%0.03%0.02%
ORCL 2.875 03/25/310.05%0.02%0.03%
NEE V6.375 08/15/55ProProPro
ABBV 4.95 03/15/31ProProPro
AVGO 4.15 11/15/30ProProPro
NOVNVX 2.2 08/14/30ProProPro
SO 1.45 09/15/30 20-ProProPro
VZ 1.75 01/20/31ProProPro
CHH 3.7 01/15/31ProProPro
FundXLS Pro
See all 10 holdings BIV shares with VCSH
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
X-ray my whole portfolio$45/quarter Pro · Cancel anytime

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BIV or VCSH?

BIV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VCSH charges 0.03%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.

Which performed better, BIV or VCSH?

Over the past year BIV returned +1.50% vs +2.85% for VCSH, so VCSH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), BIV annualized +1.00% vs +1.29% for VCSH. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, BIV or VCSH?

BIV has been the more volatile fund at 5.7% annualized versus 2.6% for VCSH. Worst drawdown: BIV -20.3% vs VCSH -12.9%.

Should I hold both BIV and VCSH?

BIV and VCSH have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between BIV and VCSH?

BIV and VCSH share 38 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 4503 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, BIV or VCSH?

BIV yields 4.18% while VCSH yields 4.44%, so VCSH currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.