BLUX vs IVV
Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BLUX delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BLUX | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | - | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | - | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +17.85% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.90% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -9.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Bluemonte Investment Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 20, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
BLUX vs IVV Performance
Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF (BLUX) is a ETF from Bluemonte Investment Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BLUX returned +23.90% while IVV returned +22.02%. Year to date, BLUX is up 17.85% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.9% for BLUX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.0% for BLUX and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BLUX charges 0.25% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period.
Holdings Overlap
BLUX and IVV share 0 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BLUX or IVV?
BLUX has an expense ratio of 0.25% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BLUX or IVV?
Over the past year BLUX returned +23.90% vs +22.02% for IVV, so BLUX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BLUX annualized +28.06% vs +7.07% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BLUX or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.9% for BLUX. Worst drawdown: BLUX -9.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BLUX and IVV?
BLUX and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between BLUX and IVV?
BLUX and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.