BMNZ vs QQQ
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, BMNZ or QQQ?
Trading-Inverse Equity against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BMNZ | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.40% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $13M | $498.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 16 | 321 |
| YTD Return | -75.37% | +23.76%Best |
| 1Y Return | -82.80% | +25.02%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +28.26% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.87% |
| Fund Family | Defiance ETFs, LLC | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Equity | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 12, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BMNZ vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BMNZ vs QQQ Performance
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF (BMNZ) is an ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BMNZ returned -82.80% while QQQ returned +25.02%. Year to date, BMNZ is down 75.37% versus a gain of 23.76% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BMNZ charges 1.40% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $140 vs $18 annually, a gap of $122 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BMNZ currently yields 0.00% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in BMNZ and 102 in QQQ, totalling 4.8% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in BMNZ and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 16 and 321.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BMNZ and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BMNZ or QQQ?
BMNZ has an expense ratio of 1.40% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $122 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BMNZ or QQQ?
Over the past year BMNZ returned -82.80% vs +25.02% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BMNZ or QQQ?
BMNZ yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than BMNZ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.