BMOP vs IVV
BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BMOP or IVV?
Municipal Bond against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BMOP | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.6B | $882.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.88% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 1,342 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -3.11% | +13.60%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.32% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.03% |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity |
| Style | Municipal Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 12, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BMOP vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BMOP vs IVV Performance
BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF (BMOP) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, BMOP is down 3.11% versus a gain of 13.60% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BMOP charges 0.49% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BMOP currently yields 1.88% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 249 holdings in BMOP and 505 in IVV, totalling 44.6% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 249 positions we hold weights for in BMOP and 505 in IVV, against full books of 1,342 and 508.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BMOP and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BMOP or IVV?
BMOP has an expense ratio of 0.49% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, BMOP or IVV?
BMOP yields 1.88% while IVV yields 1.06%, so BMOP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BMOP?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.