Quick Verdict

VCIT delivered stronger 1-year returns. BND offers more diversification with 10790 holdings.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: VCITMore Diversified: BND

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBNDVCITWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.03%
AUM$159.8B$67.3B
Dividend Yield3.94%4.77%
Holdings17,5282,253
YTD Return-0.26%-0.43%
1Y Return+2.01%+2.34%
3Y Return (annualized)+3.97%+5.82%
5Y Return (annualized)-0.25%+0.84%
Volatility (annualized)4.6%6.0%
Max Drawdown-19.6%-20.7%
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeFixed Income
InceptionApr 3, 2007Nov 19, 2009

BND vs VCIT Performance

Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BND returned +2.01% while VCIT returned +2.34%. Year to date, BND is down 0.26% versus a loss of 0.43% for VCIT.

Over three years, BND compounded at +3.97% per year against +5.82% for VCIT; over five years the annualized figures are -0.25% and +0.84% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, VCIT has the edge at +1.75% annualized vs +0.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VCIT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.0% compared with 4.6% for BND. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.6% for BND and -20.7% for VCIT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BND charges 0.03% per year while VCIT charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $3 annually. On income, BND currently yields 3.94% against 4.77% for VCIT.

Holdings Overlap

3.6%overlap

BND and VCIT share 1390 holdings out of 11419 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.6% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BNDWeight in VCITDifference
PFE 4.75 05/19/330.02%0.28%0.26%
BAC V5.015 07/22/33 0.01%0.28%0.27%
JPM V4.912 07/25/330.02%0.26%0.24%
WFC V5.557 07/25/34 ProProPro
JPM V5.35 06/01/34ProProPro
AMGN 5.25 03/02/33ProProPro
VZ 2.355 03/15/32ProProPro
JPM V5.576 07/23/36ProProPro
BAC V5.872 09/15/34ProProPro
WFC V5.389 04/24/34ProProPro
FundXLS Pro
See all 10 holdings BND shares with VCIT
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
X-ray my whole portfolio$99/yr Pro · Cancel anytime

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BND or VCIT?

BND has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VCIT charges 0.03%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.

Which performed better, BND or VCIT?

Over the past year BND returned +2.01% vs +2.34% for VCIT, so VCIT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), BND annualized +0.69% vs +1.75% for VCIT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, BND or VCIT?

VCIT has been the more volatile fund at 6.0% annualized versus 4.6% for BND. Worst drawdown: BND -19.6% vs VCIT -20.7%.

Should I hold both BND and VCIT?

BND and VCIT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between BND and VCIT?

BND and VCIT share 1390 common holdings with a 3.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 11419 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, BND or VCIT?

BND yields 3.94% while VCIT yields 4.77%, so VCIT currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.