BNDX vs EDV
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF vs Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF
Quick Verdict
EDV has a lower expense ratio. BNDX delivered stronger 1-year returns. BNDX offers more diversification with 1269 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BNDX | EDV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.07% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $83.0B | $3.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.45% | 4.83% | |
| Holdings | 13,626 | 83 | |
| YTD Return | +0.29% | -5.78% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.03% | -5.10% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.09% | -4.63% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.07% | -12.45% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.1% | 21.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.2% | -62.0% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 31, 2013 | Dec 6, 2007 |
BNDX vs EDV Performance
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BNDX returned +1.03% while EDV returned -5.10%. Year to date, BNDX is up 0.29% versus a loss of 5.78% for EDV.
Over three years, BNDX compounded at +4.09% per year against -4.63% for EDV; over five years the annualized figures are -0.07% and -12.45% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, BNDX has the edge at +1.07% annualized vs -1.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 4.1% for BNDX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.2% for BNDX and -62.0% for EDV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BNDX charges 0.07% per year while EDV charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $5 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BNDX currently yields 4.45% against 4.83% for EDV.
Holdings Overlap
BNDX and EDV share 0 holdings out of 1345 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BNDX or EDV?
BNDX has an expense ratio of 0.07% while EDV charges 0.05%. EDV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BNDX or EDV?
Over the past year BNDX returned +1.03% vs -5.10% for EDV, so BNDX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), BNDX annualized +1.07% vs -1.49% for EDV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BNDX or EDV?
EDV has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 4.1% for BNDX. Worst drawdown: BNDX -17.2% vs EDV -62.0%.
Should I hold both BNDX and EDV?
BNDX and EDV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BNDX and EDV?
BNDX and EDV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1345 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BNDX or EDV?
BNDX yields 4.45% while EDV yields 4.83%, so EDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.