BNDX vs VONG
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF vs Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
VONG has a lower expense ratio. VONG delivered stronger 1-year returns. BNDX offers more diversification with 1269 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BNDX | VONG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.07% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $83.0B | $44.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.45% | 0.54% | |
| Holdings | 13,626 | 390 | |
| YTD Return | +0.54% | +6.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.08% | +12.33% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.24% | +22.84% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.04% | +12.91% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.1% | 15.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.2% | -32.7% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | May 31, 2013 | Sep 20, 2010 |
BNDX vs VONG Performance
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BNDX returned +1.08% while VONG returned +12.33%. Year to date, BNDX is up 0.54% versus a gain of 6.80% for VONG.
Over three years, BNDX compounded at +4.24% per year against +22.84% for VONG; over five years the annualized figures are -0.04% and +12.91% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VONG has the edge at +15.85% annualized vs +1.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VONG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 4.1% for BNDX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.2% for BNDX and -32.7% for VONG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BNDX charges 0.07% per year while VONG charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $6 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BNDX currently yields 4.45% against 0.54% for VONG.
Holdings Overlap
BNDX and VONG share 0 holdings out of 1655 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BNDX or VONG?
BNDX has an expense ratio of 0.07% while VONG charges 0.06%. VONG is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BNDX or VONG?
Over the past year BNDX returned +1.08% vs +12.33% for VONG, so VONG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), BNDX annualized +1.09% vs +15.85% for VONG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BNDX or VONG?
VONG has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 4.1% for BNDX. Worst drawdown: BNDX -17.2% vs VONG -32.7%.
Should I hold both BNDX and VONG?
BNDX and VONG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BNDX and VONG?
BNDX and VONG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1655 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BNDX or VONG?
BNDX yields 4.45% while VONG yields 0.54%, so BNDX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.