BNDX vs VV
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF vs Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
Quick Verdict
VV has a lower expense ratio. VV delivered stronger 1-year returns. BNDX offers more diversification with 1269 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BNDX | VV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.07% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $83.0B | $52.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.45% | 1.25% | |
| Holdings | 13,626 | 446 | |
| YTD Return | +0.35% | +13.59% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.22% | +21.25% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.18% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.06% | +12.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.1% | 14.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.2% | -56.0% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | May 31, 2013 | Jan 27, 2004 |
BNDX vs VV Performance
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BNDX returned +1.22% while VV returned +21.25%. Year to date, BNDX is up 0.35% versus a gain of 13.59% for VV.
Over three years, BNDX compounded at +4.18% per year against +21.81% for VV; over five years the annualized figures are -0.06% and +12.84% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VV has the edge at +9.52% annualized vs +1.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.8% compared with 4.1% for BNDX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.2% for BNDX and -56.0% for VV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BNDX charges 0.07% per year while VV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $3 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BNDX currently yields 4.45% against 1.25% for VV.
Holdings Overlap
BNDX and VV share 0 holdings out of 1700 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BNDX or VV?
BNDX has an expense ratio of 0.07% while VV charges 0.03%. VV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BNDX or VV?
Over the past year BNDX returned +1.22% vs +21.25% for VV, so VV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), BNDX annualized +1.08% vs +9.52% for VV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BNDX or VV?
VV has been the more volatile fund at 14.8% annualized versus 4.1% for BNDX. Worst drawdown: BNDX -17.2% vs VV -56.0%.
Should I hold both BNDX and VV?
BNDX and VV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BNDX and VV?
BNDX and VV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1700 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BNDX or VV?
BNDX yields 4.45% while VV yields 1.25%, so BNDX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.