BNDX vs XLK
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF vs State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
Which is better, BNDX or XLK?
Long Term Mid Quality against Large Cap Growth.
BNDX has a lower expense ratio. XLK led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BNDX | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.07%Best | 0.08% |
| AUM | $82.7B | $119.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.58% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 6,859 | 77 |
| YTD Return | -0.90% | +30.37%Best |
| 1Y Return | -0.73% | +39.20%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.70% | +30.96%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.20% | +20.02%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.1%Best | 19.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.2%Best | -33.6% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,900 | $24,904Best |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | SPDR State Street Global Advisors |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Long Term Mid Quality | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 31, 2013 | Dec 16, 1998 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 4, 2013 to Sep 11, 2026 (13.3 years).
BNDX vs XLK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BNDX vs XLK Performance
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) is an ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors. Over the past year BNDX returned -0.73% while XLK returned +39.20%. Year to date, BNDX is down 0.90% versus a gain of 30.37% for XLK.
Over three years, BNDX compounded at +3.70% per year against +30.96% for XLK; over five years the annualized figures are -0.20% and +20.02% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, XLK has the edge at +20.85% annualized vs +0.98%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XLK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.4% compared with 4.1% for BNDX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.2% for BNDX and -33.6% for XLK. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BNDX charges 0.07% per year while XLK charges 0.08%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $8 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BNDX currently yields 4.58% against 0.43% for XLK.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 943 holdings in BNDX and 74 in XLK, totalling 11.3% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 943 positions we hold weights for in BNDX and 74 in XLK, against full books of 6,859 and 77.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 943 and 74 positions we hold weights for.
BNDX holds 942 positions XLK does not, 11.3% of the fund.
Largest: FRTR 2.75 10/25/27 O 0.17%, CAN 2.75 09/01/30 0.09%, CAN 3.25 12/01/34 0.08%, CAN 3.25 06/01/35 0.08%, CAN 3.5 09/01/29 0.08%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BNDX and XLK you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BNDX or XLK?
BNDX has an expense ratio of 0.07% while XLK charges 0.08%. BNDX is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BNDX or XLK?
Over the past year BNDX returned -0.73% vs +39.20% for XLK, so XLK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), BNDX annualized +0.98% vs +20.85% for XLK. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BNDX or XLK?
XLK has been the more volatile fund at 19.4% annualized versus 4.1% for BNDX. Worst drawdown: BNDX -17.2% vs XLK -33.6%.
Should I hold both BNDX and XLK?
BNDX and XLK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BNDX or XLK?
BNDX yields 4.58% while XLK yields 0.43%, so BNDX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XLK better than BNDX?
BNDX has a lower expense ratio. XLK led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.