BNGE vs IVV
First Trust S-Network Streaming and Gaming ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BNGE | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $5M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.38% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 48 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -13.43% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | -14.67% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.22% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -40.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 25, 2022 | May 15, 2000 |
BNGE vs IVV Performance
First Trust S-Network Streaming and Gaming ETF (BNGE) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BNGE returned -14.67% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, BNGE is down 13.43% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, BNGE compounded at +16.22% per year against +21.81% for IVV. Across the full 5-year window we track, BNGE has the edge at +7.18% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BNGE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.5% for BNGE and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BNGE charges 0.70% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BNGE currently yields 0.38% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BNGE and IVV share 5 holdings out of 544 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BNGE or IVV?
BNGE has an expense ratio of 0.70% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BNGE or IVV?
Over the past year BNGE returned -14.67% vs +20.94% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), BNGE annualized +7.18% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BNGE or IVV?
BNGE has been the more volatile fund at 22.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BNGE -40.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BNGE and IVV?
BNGE and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BNGE and IVV?
BNGE and IVV share 5 common holdings with a 0.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 544 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BNGE or IVV?
BNGE yields 0.38% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.